Demolition to resume on New Orleans Six Flags site after scrap metal issue. What to know.

By Ben Myers | Staff writer

The stalled demolition of the former Six Flags in New Orleans East appears to be back on track now that developers have gotten city approval for a new contractor to tear down the abandoned amusement park.

Bayou Phoenix still plans to pay the company with scrap metal sales, despite previous objections from public officials. The group may also keep a portion of the proceeds for themselves, according to the most recent contract.

The New Orleans Redevelopment Authority, a public agency that owns the 227-acre site, recently objected to Bayou Phoenix’s plans to sell off the scrap, claiming that it retains ownership of about 90 old roller coasters and buildings – though some have already been demolished and sold.

Bayou Phoenix says it is granted title to all structures on site under the lease it signed with NORA in October 2023. It won development rights three years ago in a competitive solicitation, and has laid out plans to build a youth athletic complex, water park, two hotels, a movie studio and a plethora of amenities.

“The Bayou Phoenix position hasn’t changed. It’s our property, it’s our assets,” said Troy Henry, a Bayou Phoenix partner. "We are going to do with it as we see fit."

Asked if NORA officials had agreed to that, Henry said “they don’t have to, the lease is self explanatory.”

Bayou Phoenix will get a 30% to 40% cut of any scrap metal sales that exceed $450,000, according to the contract.

NORA’s executive director, Brenda Breaux, said the two sides had "come to an agreement to reinvest any funds received" into the overall development. She didn't say what that might entail, but said the two parties "are working together to bring this important property back into commerce."

Scott Hedlund, also a partner in Bayou Phoenix, confirmed there had been a verbal agreement but declined to go into specifics.

"It's reinvestment into the project," Hedlund said. "It's an agreement so we can keep the project moving forward."

City officials ordered a halt to the long-awaited demolition last month after learning the prime contractor, Smoot Construction and Consulting, didn’t have a licensing classification for rigging and dismantling. The new contractor, Christian Korver, has that credential, according to the state licensing board. Korver had been working as a subcontractor to Smoot.

Henry said that about 25% of the demolition had been completed before the city’s stop work order last month, and the new contractor indicated Korver had already received $112,000 from scrap metal sales.

The licensing mix up wasn’t the only snag. The state Dept. of Environmental Quality also notified Bayou Phoenix that it was required to complete asbestos inspections. That has been done, and the state has cleared the way for the demolition to continue, Henry said. An inspection report the group shared shows no suspected asbestos on the site.

While Bayou Phoenix worked to straighten out the licensing and inspection issues, Breaux notified the group in a Nov. 21 letter that plans to sell off the scrap metal violated its lease.

Breaux said the lease made NORA the owner of all structures on the site, and that Bayou Phoenix must pay for the demolition at its own expense. She also said the provision transferring title to Bayou Phoenix was temporary, and that the title transfers back to NORA at the end of a 50-year lease term.

Breaux on Monday did not address the underlying question of who owns the scrap.

City Council Vice President JP Morrell also recently urged NORA to take control of the scrap metal and use proceeds for the site's infrastructure. Morrell did not respond Monday to questions about whether the recent deal satisfies those concerns.

The City Council added $5 million to the 2025 city budget for NORA to use on the site, but specific plans for spending that money aren't clear.

NORA and Bayou Phoenix have worked through tense disagreements in the past. The two sides publicly criticized each other during lease negotiations, and Breaux skewered the group’s initial master plan.

Email Ben Myers at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it..

Guest column: In food deserts, don’t just invest in grocery stores. Invest in their customers, too.
By Ken Kolb | Nov 7, 2024

Efforts to subsidize grocery stores in food deserts can work, but not if they repeat the same mistakes made in other parts of the country.

Everyone deserves access to fresh and affordable food, and two major initiatives are currently in the works across the state trying to make that happen.

The New Orleans Redevelopment Authority will spend $2 million to study and support business investment in the Lower 9th Ward, with the hopes of getting a grocery store to fill the retail void left since Katrina devastated the area nearly 20 years ago.

Similarly, in East Baton Rouge, the Office of Community Development will soon review applications for up to $3 million in funding to support healthy food retail in areas designated by the USDA as “low income” and “low access.”

As a sociologist, I have researched and written about food deserts across the country for the past decade. During that time, I have tracked similar initiatives to recruit grocery stores in both small towns and big cities.

Sadly, many of these stores closed soon after their incentive programs expired.

If the goal is to bring nutritious food retail to the Lower 9th Ward and East Baton Rouge — and keep it in business — a more sustainable solution is warranted.

Don’t just invest in grocery stores. Invest in their customers, too.

Otherwise, if we deploy the same business-first strategy that has been tried before in other food deserts, we can expect the same sad results.

Just ask the former shoppers of the Rise Community Market in Cairo, Illinois, or the Piggly Wiggly in Spartanburg, South Carolina. When their stores’ monetary incentive packages expired, they shut their doors. Efforts in bigger cities haven’t fared much better. Millions of dollars in subsidies weren’t enough to keep the lights on at a Whole Foods in Chicago or a Shop’n Save in Pittsburgh, either.

We need a more balanced approach if we want affordable food retail to thrive. Aid for businesses should be matched with funds to improve the economic mobility of their would-be customers.

Grocery stores will stick around once population incomes and density match their business plan. For that to happen, the community needs sustained investment in job training, public transportation and child care. In other words, providing people with the tools they need to get and keep better-paying jobs. The economic resiliency of consumers will be the deciding factor if targeted stores stay open in the long term.

It won’t be easy. The grocery industry is extremely competitive, and the biggest players can always beat smaller venues on price. The box-store retail revolution has been in full swing for a half-century and the Walmarts of the world can leverage savings from bulk distribution networks well beyond the reach of any local operation.

However, smaller and local grocery storefronts have their own advantages. For one, community stores save people time and transportation costs. But perhaps more importantly, local retail means more to communities than the sum of the products sold on their shelves.

Having spent countless hours at kitchen tables interviewing households’ primary shoppers about how, when and where they shop for food, I can tell you with certainty that people want local groceries. They are even willing to pay a little more for them. But they can only stretch their dollar so far.

In the Lower 9th Ward, data compiled by The Data Center show how incomes have stagnated since Katrina. In East Baton Rouge, a report by HealthyBR found that over 64,000 of its residents experience food insecurity.

The question isn’t whether to help, but how.

For the past 15 years, “healthy food” financing programs across the country have been able to recruit stores to open with enough incentives. The real challenge is to keep them from closing after the subsidies expire.

To do this, we need to reframe the debate around incentivizing retail. Instead of putting all of our eggs in one basket to reduce costs for businesses, we should diversify our community development dollars by also funding programs that foster the economic resiliency of the people who will shop in them.

Invest in customers, not just stores. As shoppers’ spending power increases, they will sustain neighborhood retail on their own terms.

New Orleans native Ken Kolb is chair of the sociology department at Furman University in Greenville, SC.

Clancy DuBos: Affordable housing in NOLA finally getting the attention it deserves
By Clancy DuBos

While the presidential race is still very much a toss-up, some winners are already certain when the votes are counted in New Orleans on Nov. 5: advocates of affordable housing and persons in need of housing assistance.

The New Orleans City Council is asking voters to approve an amendment to the City Charter that would dedicate 2% of annual general revenues to affordable housing initiatives. That measure appears on the ballot as Proposition 1.

The council is taking no chances, however. It passed an ordinance doing pretty much the same thing last March.

The main difference between the two is permanence, or lack thereof.

If voters approve Prop 1, the 2% dedication would be locked into the charter and could be changed or removed only by another referendum or by unanimous vote of a council quorum during a declared emergency. If voters reject the proposed amendment, the ordinance could be changed by the council at any time by majority vote and mayoral signature.

Neither would create a new tax. Instead, each would require the council to spend a similar amount on housing initiatives.

The charter amendment would put 2% of the city’s existing general revenue funds — about $17 million in 2025 — toward addressing the city's shortage of housing for low- and moderate-income residents. General revenues are those that are not already dedicated to specific needs or agencies and account for 18.7% of the city’s total capital and operating budgets, according to District B Council member Lesli Harris, who authored the proposed amendment.

The backup ordinance, authored by District A Council member Joe Giarrusso, sets a goal of $20 million with the amount to rise with inflation. Unlike the amendment, federal money that the city already receives could conceivably count toward the total.

Both Prop 1 and the ordinance would establish a housing trust fund administered by agencies outside of City Hall — the quasi-public Finance Authority of New Orleans and the New Orleans Redevelopment Authority — but all disbursements would be subject to council oversight.

A seven-person advisory panel, with members appointed by the council, the mayor and housing nonprofits, would advise the two agencies in determining which initiatives to fund. Advocates have suggested programs to support first-time homebuyers, to provide gap financing for affordable housing developers and to subsidize fortified roofs and other weatherization work for homeowners and small landlords.

A second proposed charter amendment also appears on the Nov. 5 ballot. Proposition 2 would add to the charter’s bill of rights a nonbinding expression of the city’s support for worker rights.

“It’s aspirational and does not have the force of law,” says City Council President Helena Moreno, the proposed amendment's author, “but it’s important to state what kind of city we want to be — one that supports equal pay, fair and safe work environments, health care pay and a living wage.”

So far, only Proposition 1 has received significant public attention.

In addition to the unanimous backing of the City Council, a handful of New Orleans developers and housing advocates have provided financial support to the Nola First Political Action Committee. The PAC created the Yes to Nola Housing website and is behind other efforts to support the creation of the NOLA Housing Trust Fund, according to financial filings and interviews.

“We’re setting the stage for real change,” says Andreanecia Morris, executive director of HousingNOLA, an affordable housing advocacy group. “These dollars, which are in addition to federal dollars for housing programs, are flexible — but there are guard rails put in. The council will oversee the administration of the money. It will also allow the city to respond when there is a crisis.”

Housing advocates have pushed officials for years to do more to address the local housing shortage. They say the city needs at least 47,000 new affordable units. 

The nonprofit Bureau of Governmental Research (BGR) has issued a report on Prop 1 and opposes it.

“The city can and should make new housing investments as part of its strategy to alleviate the problems,” BGR stated. “While the proposed charter amendment would guarantee consistent new funding for housing, it would also be difficult to alter or undo. It would unnecessarily limit the city’s budget flexibility as it confronts substantial new costs for personnel, infrastructure and other needs.”

BGR instead recommends that the council strengthen the affordable housing ordinance already in place by increasing the annual local appropriation, adopting a long-term financial plan for the housing fund and adding greater transparency and accountability to the fund’s advisory panel.

Whatever New Orleans voters decide, affordable housing is finally getting the attention it deserves.

Clancy DuBos is Gambit's politics editor. You can reach him at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it..

Demolition begins at old Six Flags site in New Orleans

By Carlie Kollath Wells

The decrepit rides at the old Six Flags site are coming down soon, developer Troy Henry tells Axios.

Why it matters: The theme park has been abandoned since it flooded during Hurricane Katrina 19 years ago.

The big picture: Bayou Phoenix, the development company for the project, is hosting a Nov. 12 event so elected officials and others can "watch as the demolition phase begins," the invitation says.

  • Henry says New Orleans-based Smoot Construction has already begun demolition.
  • The developers say they'll provide updates about the timeline at the November event.

The intrigue: Several redevelopment plans have been proposed over the years, but nothing has stuck.

Catch up quick: Bayou Phoenix plans to transform the overgrown site in New Orleans East into a bustling, $500 million complex with youth sports fields, hotels, shops, a movie studio and a waterpark.

  • The New Orleans Redevelopment Authority approved the master plan last year and signed a lease with Bayou Phoenix for the 227-acre site.
  • The developers are seeking about $100 million in government funding for infrastructure, Henry says. Other pieces will be self-financed, he said.

New Orleans plans to turn a 100-year-old firehouse into affordable housing, childcare center

By Joni Hess | Staff writer

Construction is set to begin on a blighted, century-old firehouse on Louisiana Avenue that will become New Orleans’ first city-owned property to include both affordable housing units and an early childhood education center, city leaders said Wednesday.

As part of a joint initiative between the city and the New Orleans Redevelopment Authority, the $8 million project will have seven second-floor housing units above a childhood education center on the first floor.

City officials said at a Wednesday news conference that they hope the renovation will help address blight, an affordable housing crisis and the need for more childcare seats.

The project will be the first under a new Redevelopment Framework between the city and NORA that puts neglected city-owned properties back into use in the form of affordable housing and commercial development.

“It also highlights the power of public-private partnerships in addressing our city’s most pressing needs," NORA Executive Director Brenda Breaux said in a news release.

City leaders said they hope the project serves as a model for investments in other vacant and abandoned properties.

Early education

The childcare center will have a 65-seat capacity and will accept both private pay and publicly funded assistance, while the housing units will be open to families who earn 50%, 60% or 80% of area's median income.

Funding is pooled from a mix of sources with a large chunk coming from state and federal tax credits.

A slice of the money is expected to come from the city-wide early childhood education millage, which along with state matched funds, supports 2,000 children annually from low-income households.

A spokesperson with the millage-funded City Seats program facilitator Agenda for Children said all publicly funded seats — including state-funded programs — are at capacity, which speaks to the “overall need for more child care centers and options in New Orleans.”

Local affordable housing developers People's Housing+ and Alembic Community Development are leading the project, with CDW Services as the general contractor and Kiro Studios as the project architect. 

“We're really excited to bring this important building back into service to the community,” Oji Alexander, CEO of project developer People’s Housing+, said Wednesday.

The building is expected to be operational by the start of the 2026 school year. 

Housing a priority

Council member Lesli Harris, whose district includes the firehouse, and Alexander said the project is an example of one that could be supported through a permanent affordable housing fund that voters will consider on the Nov. 5 ballot.

The Housing Trust Fund would not be a new tax, she said, but rather a reallocation of 2% of the city’s budget to affordable housing programs.

“This is a reinvestment of ourselves into our city to make sure that we're not using New Orleanians; to make sure we're keeping people in city centers so they can get to their homes and jobs easier,” she said.

If passed, the City Council’s proposed housing fund would be cemented into the city charter, where it could only be diverted by a unanimous council vote for an emergency or another public vote.

The measure has drawn support from housing advocates, developers and policy experts, while critics — such as policy research group the Bureau of Governmental Research — say redirecting millions from the city’s budget is too restrictive for other priorities.

Email Joni Hess at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it..